If investors would like to protect and invest their investment or savings in stock market during this slow economy, they must ensure not put all their eggs in one basket, and need to diversify their investments in different companies with great management (e.g., Procter & Gamble, McDonald's, Southwest, or Wal-Mart), industries or trades (e.g., food, or high-tech business, especially in risk analysis or management software), and locations or nations. In 2008, the average number of customers served per day in McDonald's restaurants advanced to more than 58 million in 118 countries (about 32,000 outlets worldwide and 14,000 of them are in the U.S.—2 million more than a year ago, and not all them are in recession). According to NASDAQ.com., as compared to other food services chain stores’ current EPS (Earnings per share): Yum ($1.91), Starbucks ($0.59), and Darden restaurants ($2.68); McDonald’s Corporation ($3.67) was the highest one (MC, 2009, p.1). In practice, top executives of McDonald’s recognize and ensure its business – a) coffee that compete with Starbucks or Tim Horton’s (e.g., in Ontario, Canada, it offers $1.39 for a good quality regular coffee with a fresh muffin and butter plus refill); b) trendy, healthy, and broader menus (e.g., fresh salads or yogurt); c) improved services and speed in drive-through windows or counters that advance sales and revenues; and d) cut travel, expense, waste, or cost of production, and get better deals from suppliers, and advertising agents.Adamy (2009) analyzed the Company and claimed that excellent operations management and financial managing with up-to-date business data and evaluations not only improved the value of its franchisees or store owners’ businesses, and kept McDonald's in the top of the industry (with number 16 of the most admired world organizations in Fortune 500), but also help the organization preparing for difficult time currently or the coming years. Yes, again, as people state: Survival of the fittest. From my experience, in the business world, you are either a leader, or follow the leader.
References
McDonald’s (MC). (2009). NASDAQ.Retrieved March 12, 2009, from
http://www.nasdaq.com/earnings/peratio.asp?symbol=MCD&symbol
Adamy, J. (2009, March 10). McDonald's seeks way to keep sizzling. The wall
street journal. Retrieved March 12, 2009, from http://online.wsj.com/article
0 Comments
McDonald’s Corporation (or the Company), ticker symbol: MCD (NYSE), mainly manages and franchises McDonald’s restaurants in the food service and fast food industry. McDonald’s food chain stores serve a wide-ranging but limited, value-priced list of options in more than hundred countries worldwide. All McDonald’s restaurants are operated either by the Corporation, by independent investors, businesses and franchisees (under the tenure of franchise arrangements), or by partners and developmental licensees operating under contracts. Under the franchise agreement, franchisees or store owners not only provide the required funds by initially investing in the equipment or facilities (e.g., kitchen equipment or wares, signs, tables and seats) and interior decoration of their restaurants, and also by reinvesting in the enterprise and the store over time. The Corporation mostly contributes to the original investment by owning the real estate, land, construction and store or getting hold of long-term leases for restaurant sites. Franchisees and investors “contribute to the Company’s revenue stream through the payment of rent and royalties based upon a percent of sales, with specified minimum rent payments, along with initial fees. The conventional franchise arrangement typically lasts 20 years and franchising practices are generally consistent throughout the world” (MC10-K, 2009, p.3). By owning or securing lasting leases and then getting fair rental returns from store owners are the most rewards and most important parts in its operations that providing stable revenues and excellent income to support its costly franchising operations management (especially very vital and necessary in its initial and early stage of business, or in a new location and new marketplace with less business risk and financial risk). Moreover, under the Company’s developmental license agreement, licensees invest principal funding for the entire business, together with the real estate interest. Although the Company usually has no capital offered or invested, it gets a royalty based on a percent of sales, and opening fees from franchisees that want to join the establishment and the brand. In return, the Corporation’s operations management is aimed to promote the brand, and make certain or consistency and high quality at all its restaurants or fast food chain stores. In all, McDonald’s top executives would like to improve cost effective and efficient, enhance the values of its stakeholders, and ensure superior support of operations management with foster and strengthen customer services, management, and finance excellence. EVA (economic value added) is an assessment tool to measure a firm's financial performance and to motivate its management as well. The key reasons why firm may use EVA in addition to the standard accounting measure (e.g., GAAP) are due to the disagreement between an investment's net operating income or profits after taxes and the cost of funding (e.g., EVA = Net operating profit after taxes – Capital x cost of capital) ( EVA, 2009). EVA shows true profits and gets a more true assess than just profits, and increased correlation with stock price than only gets earnings per share (EPS). EVA takes the total cost of capital ( equity and debt capital both), and not cost of debt or interest expense. EVA considers R & D as a capitalized expense on future development and not as a term expense only. Therefore as EVA value increases that also means stock value may follow—all these would help and improve overall performance. Companies uses EVA put more on allocating assets and not accounting profits only—it would intensify the development of new goods even it decreases present earnings (Gitman, 2009). In all, EVA tries to capit the real economic profit of an organization. . EVA is economic value added, a management tool. EVA supporters claim it helps to find out a firm’s ability to create wealth than the traditional measurement of EPS and return on equity. Carrick (2007) points out, by using EVA approach, “you take the profits a company makes and then subtract the full cost of generating those profits. If the company has profits left over, it's adding economic value; if the costs of generating a profit exceed the profit, then value is being destroyed” (p.1). The object of EVA method is to find out the real profits (or promotes the wisdom of entrepreneur, and innovation in organizational management) from the business, and not just politics, or paper work. In order to improve risk management, and financing, this is why when we get new projects with new customers, we take more caution and ask them to pay enough deposits or ensure they have good finance back up before taking their orders. We just completed a project for a sport retailer with full payment ahead and gave them 2% discount in the deal—at the end, both sides were very happy and pleased the result. Good management and approaches that deal with business risk and financial risk, or plan ahead are very important to a small business, and the same toward a large organization. When we invest or make business decisions, business risk and financial risk are all together like rewards and penalty; the more risk, the more returns. For instance, in the subjects of new projects, the cash flows related to capital budgeting projects in general have all kinds of risk, therefore, it is vital to include risk considerations in capital budgeting. In this situation, various behavioral approaches (e.g., the breakeven cash flow, scenario analysis of cash flow and NPVs, and simulation of statistics) can be used to deal with project risk (Gitman, 2009). Managers must understand the significance of recognizing risk in the examination of capital budgeting projects or implications of these beliefs on deciding which new ventures to finance. No plan and no gain. In some cases, we can use payback period method (simple to compute and easy to understand: cost of project divided by annual cash inflows) to get a quick idea of what kind of investment we deal with, and then consider whether to go ahead or not (with detailed Net Present Value approach later). For instance, in a fast moving market, such as in commercial and investment property markets, investors can use payback period method to find out how long, or which one has the shorter payback period. The reason behind this is that "the shorter the payback period, the greater the liquidity, and the less risky the project" (Payback period, 2009, p.1). However, it must be very carefully (with good investment experience and have good real estate broker and lawyer to draft and present your buy and sale agreements) when make use of this approach. Cash flows not only show whether the firm will be able to pay suppliers, wages, or other high priority expenses (e.g., rent, or bank interest), but also demonstrate a clear picture of a firm’s power or ability to repay loans (for lender’ view) and whether the firm is financially sound and good (for investor’ view). Financial Times in London on February 12, 2009, reported that even AIG (now 80% owned by the U.S. government) generates about $10 billion of cash flow per year (from commercial property and casualty business as well as its Asian life insurance—life policies mainly come from Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Japan), and assume half of them are utilized to pay down debts and the firm would owe for about $70 billion of debt in five years (Financial Times, 2009). Because of AIG gets into the right markets and sells the right policies, and gets high cash flows, this is why it can hold on and keep the company running. |